Showing posts with label Liberal Crimes. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Liberal Crimes. Show all posts
Friday, April 17, 2020
Thursday, May 23, 2019
Michael Avenatti Indicted: Stole From Stormy Daniels To Fund 'Extravagant' Life
CNN and MSNBc especially propped this creepy guy up on their networks with reckless abandon for months all because he hated President Trump. They even let him get away with the terrible slander he hurled at Brett Kavanaugh during his hearing for SCOTUS and drooled at the prospect that he could take down Trump. Now what do they have to say for themselves? One thing's for sure, it won't be an apology.
RELATED: Michael Avenatti says he 'flew too close to the sun' in rise and fall
Monday, April 29, 2019
Kim Foxx Subpoenaed in Jussie Smollett Case
The minute Foxx appeared with Jessie Jackson and started using the race card, you just knew she was up to no good.
RELATED: Column: Kim Foxx's embarrassing OMG moment in the Jussie Smollett case
Friday, April 26, 2019
Wednesday, January 9, 2019
Second Black Man Found Dead In Democratic Donor Ed Buck’s Home
This guy is a major Hillary donor.
RELATED: 2 deaths at Ed Buck’s home and West Hollywood is asking agonizing questions about race and class
Tuesday, August 1, 2017
Saturday, November 19, 2016
Thursday, November 10, 2016
Alex Jones: Donald Trump Must Keep His Promise to Prosecute The Clinton Crime Family
I honestly don't want Hillary Clinton to be imprisoned, because that could hurt conservatives in the long run. Would much rather Hillary just go away and never come back and the feds go after the Clinton Foundation for its many crimes.
RELATED: Donald Trump could actually take steps to try to jail Hillary Clinton
Tuesday, April 19, 2016
Tuesday, August 4, 2015
Democrats Protecting Illegal Sanctuary Cities
HotAir.com:
Last month, trying to strike while the iron was hot, some members of Congress – most notably Chuck Grassley – drafted legislation to reign in the so called “sanctuary cities” where illegal immigrants are regularly released back into the wild. This takes place in many cases unless there is some definitive indication that they are currently engaged in a murder spree. It will frequently happen even if federal immigration officials asked for them to be held for deportation. The Democrats have been calling this new legislation the Donald Trump Act, in an ironic attempt at an insult, even while Trump himself was happy to take credit for all the support such an initiative received in conservative circles.RELATED: Massachusetts Mayor Hits Back at Bobby Jindal: ‘Come and Get Me’
It’s still unclear if any version of such a bill will make it into law, but liberal enclaves are bracing for the changes to come in case they do. The Daily Iowan reports some of the “concerns” that they are dealing with now.
Locally, the Johnson County Sheriff’s Office policy of refusing to hold suspects requested by Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials would put it at risk of losing certain federal grants under bills proposed by Grassley and Republican colleagues in the House.While “sanctuary city” is a loose term, it has been used to apply to cities such as New York City and San Francisco, which have specific laws aimed at undocumented immigrants, and more broadly to other jurisdictions that refuse to cooperate with federal immigration authorities…Johnson County Sheriff Lt. John Good defended his department’s policy from criticism rooted in the San Francisco case. He said complying with federal immigration officials would mean potentially violating the civil liberties of a suspect.“We don’t want to house them any longer than we need to,” he said.Keeping people suspected of being undocumented, Good said, would put the department at risk of violating a suspect’s civil liberties, which could, in turn, put the county at risk of a lawsuit. Those concerns led the department to change its policy in May 2014.This line of reasoning completely boggles my mind. If someone is a citizen or otherwise in the country legally, they should be able to prove that in fairly short order. And assuming they are and have not broken any laws, you don’t need to worry about “holding them” for an excessive period of time. If they are in the country illegally, why are you wringing your hands over threats of lawsuits and their “civil liberties” during detention?
They are criminals by virtue of being in the country. If there is probable cause to believe that they have been involved in some sort of violent crime you should be holding them whether they are a citizen or not. This isn’t long division.
Saturday, July 11, 2015
Majority of Voters Say Justice Dept Should Penalize ‘Sanctuary Cities’ Housing Illegals
FreeBeacon.com:
A majority of likely U.S. voters believe the Justice Department should take legal action against cities that provide sanctuary for illegal immigrants.Ignore the liberal lies out there. This issue isn't about an 'entire race of people' as some hyperbole's on the Left would like you to believe. It's about people, of any race, coming into this country illegally and on top of that committing crimes while they're here. Those are the people who need to be deported and stay deported and any person or town that protects them needs to feel the full force of the law.
According to a Rasmussen Reports poll released Friday, 62 percent of likely voters say the Justice Department should penalize “sanctuary cities” that do not comply with the federal government’s immigration laws.
The poll comes as sanctuary cities undergo extra scrutiny following last week’s murder of a San Francisco woman suspected to have been carried out by an illegal immigrant.
Only 26 percent oppose the federal government taking legal action against such cities, and 12 percent of likely voters are undecided on the issue.
Furthermore, a majority of 58 percent agree that the federal government should cut off funds to these sanctuary cities for providing asylum for illegal immigrants to the U.S., while 32 percent oppose such punishment.
RELATED: Report: Lawmakers Working On Bill In Response To Kate Steinle’s Murder By Illegal Alien
Friday, July 10, 2015
Fox’s Jesse Watters Confronted San Francisco Board of Supervisors over Kate Steinle’s Death
Mediaite.com:
Bill O’Reilly‘s roving reporter Jesse Watters dropped his usual shtick to get serious and confront San Francisco’s board of supervisors over Kate Steinle‘s death.RELATED: San Francisco Sheriff Brought Kate Steinle's Illegal Alien Killer Back to The City
Since Monday, O’Reilly has made it clear he’s very outraged about Steinle being shot dead by an illegal immigrant who had already been deported. He said the Obama administration is “complicit” and her death is “collateral damage” of San Francisco’s “insane left-wing politics.”
Tonight he kept the focus on San Francisco, showing video of Watters there yesterday confronting the city board of supervisors over their “dangerous sanctuary city policies.” ADVERTISEMENT
He held up a picture of Steinle, said the city let her killer out, and called them out for their silence and for not looking at the photo.
Later on in the segment, Watters attempted to confront other city officials in their offices about her death, but did not exactly get direct responses.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)