Showing posts with label Ruth Ginsburg. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ruth Ginsburg. Show all posts
Friday, July 17, 2020
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Being Treated for Cancer Recurrence
Geez, as long as she's been sick and in and out of hospital's wouldn't it just be best if she just retired?
RELATED: Justice Ginsburg Has Recurrence Of Cancer, Has Been Undergoing Chemotherapy Since May
Friday, June 28, 2019
Supreme Court Blocks Census Citizenship Question For Now
John Roberts doesn't want to become the new Anthony Kennedy, he IS the new Anthony Kennedy.
RELATED: SCOTUS Rules Against Citizenship Question On Census … For Now
Thursday, May 30, 2019
Justice Clarence Thomas: Abortion Being Used as a ‘Tool of Eugenic Manipulation’
Hey, the dark history of Planned Parenthood's founder certainly supports Justice Thomas' opinion.
RELATED: Why Clarence Thomas wrote over a dozen pages on eugenics
Thursday, September 13, 2018
Ruth Bader Ginsburg Criticizes Treatment of Brett Kavanaugh During SCOTUS Hearings: “Highly Partisan Show”
This might be the most sensical thing Ginsburg has said in years.
RELATED: Why Ruth Bader Ginsburg is the workout inspiration we all need
Monday, July 30, 2018
Ruth Bader Ginsburg Quote of the Day!
“I’m now 85. My senior colleague, Justice John Paul Stevens, he stepped down when he was 90, so think I have about at least five more years.”
- Supreme Court Judge Ruth Ginsburg on rumors of her retiring soon
Thursday, June 8, 2017
Sunday, June 4, 2017
Friday, March 31, 2017
Sunday, February 26, 2017
Sunday, February 5, 2017
Wednesday, October 12, 2016
Black Liberals Silent After Liberal SCOTUS Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Says Colin Kaepernick's National Anthem Protest is 'Dumb, Disrespectful, Stupid'
Now everyone knows damn well that if Justice Alito, Thomas or Roberts said this, the outrage from the Left would be extraordinary. But then what matters to white liberals is a hell of lot different from what matters to black libs, too bad they're too dumb and naive to understand that.
RELATED: Ruth Bader Ginsburg Was Never Really “Notorious RBG”
Sunday, July 17, 2016
Ain't The Devil Happy: In The News - Week of 7/17/16
28 Pages Suggest Huma-Connected Group Funded Terrorism
After 1st Logo Received Pushback, Trump-Pence Reveal New Logo Americans Can Get Behind
The Unseemly RBG
Cruz Steps Into Spotlight For Trump
Trump Campaign Still Dangerously Close To Being Broke
Pence Choice Offers Hope for America
ABC/WashPost Poll: Clinton Losing Ground Among Women
USA Today's First Headline Said Pakistan Honor Killing Was Due to 'Offending Conservatives'
Crowds Rejoice; Failed Coup Strengthens Turkey's President
Manafort Confirms Christie Was 'Livid' He Wasn't Picked To Be Trump's VP
Friday, July 15, 2016
Thursday, July 14, 2016
Wednesday, July 13, 2016
Tuesday, July 12, 2016
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Dismisses Any Thought of Donald Trump Presidency
Of course, this isn't the first time that this old bat has exposed her uber-leftwing bias in public. She should be removed, but thanks to the Constitution and lifetime SCOTUS appointments, there's nothing anyone can do about it.
RELATED: Did “Notorious RBG” go too far?
Wednesday, April 29, 2015
Liberal Supreme Court Justices Ruth Ginsburg and Elena Kagan Have Both Officiated Gay Marriages
Newsmax.com:
At least one Supreme Court justice has signaled how she is likely to weigh in on a much-watched case over marriage equality, Yahoo Politics reports.RELATED: Justices Kennedy, Scalia Much Alike, But Not on Gay Issues
Ruth Bader Ginsburg has been talking a bit more freely about the case, noting increasing support for gay marriage in interviews, Yahoo reported as the high court prepares to hear oral arguments on Tuesday.
"I would be very surprised if the Supreme Court retreats from what it has said about same-sex unions," Ginsburg, 82, said in a January interview with The New York Times' Gail Collins, Yahoo reported.
Her remarks were in reference to the court's decision in 2012 "that found the federal government must recognize same-sex marriages," Yahoo said.
Both Ginsburg and her fellow Justice Elena Kagan have officiated at same-sex weddings, prompting some traditional marriage advocacy groups to say they must recuse themselves from ruling on the latest case, Obergefell v. Hodges.
That outcry is likely misplaced, Yahoo said, citing Columbia Law School Professor Jamal Greene. Yahoo said he pointed out that "officiating at a same-sex marriage in a jurisdiction that already allows it does not call into question the justices’ impartiality on that question."
While Ginsburg has not overtly shown her hand, she made note of the shift in public opinion on gay marriage in a February interview with Bloomberg.
"It would not take a large adjustment," the former civil rights attorney said, for Americans to accept a ruling legalizing same-sex marriages.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
