ABC News Anchor George Stephanopoulos Apologizes for Not Disclosing $50K Donation to Clinton Foundation

Mediaite.com:

George Stephanopoulos was forced to apologize today after it was revealed that he donated roughly $50,000 to the Clinton Foundation in the past two years, and did not disclose them while reporting on the Clintons’ activities.

In his statement, sent to Politico, the ABC anchor admitted that in 2013 and 2014, he donated $25,000 per year to the Clinton Foundation, run by his former boss Bill Clinton and current presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. “I thought that my contributions were a matter of public record,” he said, pointing to tax filings that disclosed his contributions. “However, in hindsight, I should have taken the extra step of personally disclosing my donations to my employer and to the viewers on air during the recent news stories about the Foundation. I apologize.”

In recent years, and the past few months in particular, critics of Stephanopoulos have demanded that he disclose his relationship to the Clintons before reporting on them — he served as the White House Communications Director and a senior policy advisor during the Clinton Administration — and these revelations will likely vindicate their concerns. 

But the real kick in the teeth comes from this interview he conducted last month with Clinton Cash author Peter Schweizer, in which Stephanopoulos vigorously challenged Schweizer’s assertion that as Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton would do favors for countries that made multimillion dollar donations to the Clinton Foundation. 

RELATED:  Stephanopoulos, ABC: Oops, it was $75K, not $50K to Clinton Foundation

Amazon Becomes Gender Neutral, Removes 'Boys' and 'Girls' Labels in Toy Department

NYDailyNews.com:

Amazon is trying to get rid of labels.

In what seems like an attempt to be gender neutral, Amazon removed the labels "Boy Toys" and "Girl Toys" from its search filters under the Toy Department. Consumers will only be able to search for toys based on the child's age or type of toy: arts and crafts, action figures, dress up and pretend play, etc.

Twitter user @jackdanger was one of the first to notice online.

Jack Danger @jackdanger

This week Amazon eliminated the gendered taxonomy of toys: http://www.amazon.com/gp/browse.html?ref%5F=nav%5Fshopall%5Ftg&node=165793011&pldnSite=1 … There are no more "boys" and "girls" sections!

However, the "Boys' Toys" and "Girls' Toys" buttons still exist under the search bar. The pages for these buttons are also still live. The "Girls' Toys & Games" page features dolls, crafts and pretend play. The "Boys' Toys & Games" page features the new "Avengers" action figures and cars.

Amazon has not released a statement as to why it removed the search terms from its filter. The Daily News reached out for comment, but Amazon didn't immediately respond.

Bowing down to the Gay Mafia and PC police is so IN!!! right now and makes you look so COOL!!!

RELATED:  Amazon Didn't Really Eliminate Gender Taxonomy for Toys—Yet

White Liberals: Barack Obama Criticized Elizabeth Warren in ‘Sexist Way’

Mediaite.com:

Democratic Senator Sherrod Brown implied earlier today that President Obama‘s criticisms of Senator Elizabeth Warren may possibly be tinged with just a hint of sexism.

Well, the president of the National Organization of Women was asked about the same issue by The Hill, and said the same thing, without all the sugarcoating.

Terry O’Neill said, “Yes, I think it is sexist. I think the president was trying to build up his own trustworthiness on this issue by convincing us that Senator Warren’s concerns are not to be taken seriously. But he did it in a sexist way.”

And the subtext of Obama’s remarks dismissing Warren as just another politician, she said, was just “the little lady just doesn’t know what she’s talking about.”

Funny watching Barack Obama pretend to be surprised when Godless white liberals, whose destructive social agenda he's always supported, fail to back him in the same way.

RELATED: Senate deals stinging defeat to Obama trade agenda

Hillary Clinton Has Yet To Give An Interview Since Declaring Run For President

Breitbart.com:

Friday marks 26 days since Clinton formally announced she is running for president, but she has yet to do a formal interview with national media, extending her own record as the presidential candidate who’s waited longest in modern history.

Clinton’s silence comes as political reporters are buzzing about the book “Clinton Cash,” which details influence peddling by the Clinton Foundation. The book is written by Breitbart News Senior Editor at Large Peter Schweizer.

The Washington Post’s Erik Wemple writes on media organizations, but recently took to his blog to point on the New York Times’ approach to dealing with Hillary Clinton’s silence to reporters.

Wemple said New York Times reporter Amy Chozick has created what he coined “the air question.”

Chozick decided to post questions online that she would like to ask Clinton – that is – if Clinton was taking any media questions.

Her post following Clinton’s comment on immigration Tuesday read:

“President Obama said his executive action on immigration went as far as the law will allow. You say you would go beyond what he did. How could you stretch the law further than the president of your own party and his Justice Department says it can go?”

Wemple wrote The Erik Wemple Blog would continue to report on Chozick’s series of questions “if the Times air-questions Clinton on her sparse Q-and-A availability, which would be a glorious meta-media moment.”

RELATED: Federal judge agrees to reopen Hillary Clinton email lawsuit

Massachusetts Schools Ask 12-Year-Olds If They’ve Had Anal or Oral Sex

LifeSite.com:

Across Massachusetts – and across America – thousands of schoolchildren are given sexually graphic, psychologically intrusive surveys by the public schools without parents’ knowledge. These surveys also ask youth to reveal their criminal activity, personal family matters, and other intimate issues.

This is done in the public middle schools and high schools during school hours. At best, parents are told about the surveys in vague terms, but are rarely allowed read them beforehand.  The surveys are “officially” anonymous and voluntary. But they are administered by the teacher in a classroom and (according to teachers we’ve talked to) there is often pressure for all kids to participate.

The major survey given to kids across America is the “Youth Risk Behavior Survey” put together every two years by the national Centers for Disease Control and handed off to state and local education departments (which they can modify). And there are many similar surveys administered in various districts.

Here are questions from the actual “Youth Risk Behavior Survey” surveys given to children in Massachusetts schools, grades 7-12.
How old are you?
A.  12 years old or younger
B.  13 years old
C.  14 years old
D.  15 years old
E.  16 years old
F.  17 years old
G.  18 years old or older

=== Sexual Behavior ===
Which of the following best describes you?
A.  Heterosexual (straight)
B.  Gay or lesbian
C.  Bisexual
D.  Not sure

A transgender person is someone whose biological sex at birth does not match the way they think or feel about themselves. Are you transgender?
A.  No, I am not transgender
B.  Yes, I am transgender and I think of myself as really a boy or man
C.  Yes, I am transgender and I think of myself as really a girl or woman
D.  Yes, I am transgender and I think of myself in some other way
E.  I do not know if I am transgender
F.  I do not know what this question is asking

Have you ever had sexual intercourse (oral, anal, vaginal)?
A.  Yes
B.  No

How old were you when you had sexual intercourse (oral, anal, vaginal) for the first time?
A.  I have never had sexual intercourse
B.  11 years old or younger
C.  12 years old
D.  13 years old
E.  14 years old
F.  15 years old
G.  16 years old
H.  17 years old or older

The only answer/solution to this in Obama's Godless society? Homeschool or send yoru kids to parochial school.

RELATED:  Schools Quiz Twelve-Year-Olds about Gay, Oral, and Anal Sex

Geraldo Rivera: ‘Hatemonger’ Geller Isn’t Doing This for Free Speech

Mediaite.com:

We’ve documented multiple times over the past few days how Fox News has been a bit divided on what to make of Pamela Geller‘s “Draw Muhammad” cartoon contest. You have Megyn Kelly and The Five fully behind Geller’s actions as a matter of principle, while Greta Van Susteren and Bill O’Reilly both have expressed their opposition to being so aggressively and intentionally provocative.

Well, you can add Fox’s own Geraldo Rivera to the latter group, as he made abundantly clear in tweets from both Tuesday and today about the matter:

Geraldo RiveraVerified account ‏@GeraldoRivera

Pamela Geller has the right to voice her hateful ideas, but don't pretend its about free speech. Its about insulting, taunting and inciting.

• Retweets 102
• Favorites 98
• 

5:48 PM - 6 May 2015

Geller responded to the criticism about incitement by saying that’s akin to a “she was wearing a short skirt” rape defense.

RELATED:  Even Laura Ingraham thinks Pamela Geller’s anti-Islam event went too far

Ann Coulter Column - Smart Policing: Lock Up Liberals

Townhall.com:

Astronomically low crime rates may be one of the greatest public policy triumphs in history. All this time, liberals have been lying in wait, dying to undo all the accomplishments of the last 20 years. 

A quarter century of peace has lulled ordinary people into taking their safety for granted. They naturally assume that everyone regards it as a good thing that people are able to go about their lives without being raped, beaten, slashed or murdered. 

They don't know liberals. I've been warning you since 2001 that, as soon as we left the room, liberals would start emptying the prisons and loosing predators on us again. 

The stunning crime reduction of the last couple of decades is being called a "public policy disaster" from every news outlet -- even the news outlets currently being looted in Baltimore. 

Last week, The New York Times' Andrew Rosenthal praised Hillary Clinton, saying she had "correctly identified this country's racist incarceration policies as a wrong that must be righted." 

The New York Times' working assumption is that the only way to judge the criminal justice system is to ask if Al Sharpton is unhappy. 

The next day, yet another opinion piece hailed Hillary for confronting "American problems of poverty and violence, racial injustice and criminal policing," and her switch from a "conventionally tough-on-crime politician" to, presumably, a conventionally soft-on-crime politician. The column's only complaint was that "the solutions she was listing have been known for years. For decades." 

Yes, we spent all of the 1970s and 1980s trying those solutions -- and our cities were war zones. 

It wasn't politicians, but the public that finally demanded that the criminal class be taken out of circulation. Politicians had no choice: Either they had to build more prisons or be voted out of office. 

Democrats, social workers, liberal judges and criminologists fought like mad to keep criminals on the street, coming up with ever-more creative excuses for why prison doesn't work and continuing to demand that we "close the achievement gap." 

So much blood is on their hands! The "root cause" advocates are directly responsible for hundreds of thousands of murders, rapes, slashed faces, broken limbs and ruined lives. 

By abandoning the left's "close the achievement gap" crime-fighting policies, the nation's murder rate was halved -- to say nothing of the rape, assault and burglary rates. At least 150,000 Americans who would have been murdered under the old policies are still alive. 

RELATED:  CNN’s Cuomo to Rep. Cummings: Aren’t Democrats Responsible for Baltimore Failings?

Bill O’Reilly Tackles Texas Shooting: ‘Insulting the Entire Muslim World Is Stupid’

Mediaite.com:

If you’ve been glued to Fox News all of tonight, you may have noticed two separate anchors criticizing the actions of the group behind the “Draw Mohammed” cartoon contest in the span of ten minutes. Greta Van Susteren ended her show by scolding the American Freedom Defense Initiative and its founder Pamela Geller for putting law enforcement at risk, and mere moments later, Bill O’Reilly kicked off his program by repeatedly saying what Geller and the AFDI did was “stupid.”

O’Reilly burnished his own anti-jihadist credentials as he said, “Insulting the entire Muslim world is stupid… It does not advance the cause of liberty or get us any closer to defeating the savage jihad.”

In fact, O’Reilly argued that it actually “hurts the cause” to fight jihad, and Laura Ingraham agreed with him that it isn’t “beneficial.” Neither of them discounted the importance of the free speech, but as far as O’Reilly’s concerned, that’s “not in play” here.

Ingraham also called it “stupid” to intentionally provoke like that, and cited what Pope Francis said about Charlie Hebdo, that it’s “rude [and] unnecessary.” O’Reilly concluded, “Just because you can say it doesn’t mean you should say it.”

RELATED: Greta Van Susteren Scolds Pamela Geller’s Group for Putting Cops at Risk

Liberal Media Forced To Report That Bruce Jenner Hit with Wrongful Death Suit over Fatal Car Crash of Kim Howe

Mediaite.com:

Bruce Jenner was hit with a wrongful death suit today over a car crash that left one woman dead.

Back in February, Jenner got into a three-car crash when he hit one car, which then was hit by another vehicle. Kim Howe, the female driver in one of the cars, died, and Jenner soon released a statement expressing “my heartfelt and deepest sympathies.”

But now, according to TMZ, Howe’s two stepchildren have filed a wrongful death lawsuit, calling Jenner “careless and negligent” and blaming him for speeding and being inattentive when he crashed into her car.
TMZ notes that Howe’s stepkids had “virtually no relationship” with her.

Jenner, of course, got lots of media attention last week when he spoke out about his transition to female in an ABC News interview.

About time the liberal media (who while calling this freak a 'hero' after his notorious interview with Diane Sawyer, totally ignored his part in the death of  is forced to report on what really matters concerning on the going-ons of this sexual freak and illegal talking-on-cellphone-while-driving 'woman' named Bruce Jenner.

RELATED: Kim Howe, woman killed in crash with Bruce Jenner, remembered as charitable friend who counted Kardashians as neighbors

Hollyweird Actress Maria Bello Proves That Homosexuality Is A Choice

THR.com:

Maria Bello's 2013 New York Times op-ed, in which the mother of one opened up about her romantic relationship with best friend Clare Munn, sparked a wide-reaching conversation about sexual orientation and identification. The Prisoners actress, 48, continues that conversation in her book of essays, Whatever … Love Is Love: Questioning the Labels We Give Ourselves, which hit shelves on April 28. THR talked to Bello about her views, her work and the consequences of her revelation.

Your book is about questioning labels. Do you believe sexuality is fluid?
Absolutely. So many people have come to me and shared stories. One woman said the other day that she's been married for 26 years, but she hasn't had sex with her husband in 6 years — but they are the best of friends and great companions and she thinks he may have had an affair, but it doesn't really matter to her. There are different ways to have relationships and maybe it's time to start being really honest about that. I mean the very definition of desire is to want something you don't have; for many people in longtime committed relationships it's very difficult to desire the same person. I always say whether you are conservative or liberal, black, white, man, woman, whatever — sexuality is very complicated, and let's just stop pointing fingers and start asking questions instead.

In your book, you write that a lot of media outlets got it wrong when your essay was published, writing that you came out as a lesbian. Has that been hard?
It was disheartening, but I sort of expected that because that is the easy answer. But that was not the point to the story and not the point of my journey. In my story, traditional labels don't seem to fit anymore for most people; they are limiting the possibility for me to become who I am meant to be. I just don't define myself by who I have sex with.

You wrote in your New York Times piece that you wondered how coming out would affect your career. Has it?
A woman came up to me at an event — and she's a producer in Hollywood, a well-known lesbian — and she was always a little bit rude to me. Like, not nice at all. She said, "Welcome to the club." I said, "I don't want to be in your club." The club I want to belong to is the people that come from their heart and are fighting for people they love and standing by people they love.

Despite being in a sexual relationship with a woman for the first time, this 48-year-old weirdo and mother says don't call her a 'lesbian'...right.

RELATED: Yes, gay is a choice. Get over it.