Sunday, November 8, 2015

The Thugification of Ben Carson


TheDailyBeast.com:
Ben Carson might well be the “Rick Ross” of presidential politics.

In no small irony, the retired neurosurgeon—much like the chart-topping rapper— is under fire for allegedly misleading the public about parts of his life story. Ross, also known as “Teflon Da Don,” was never the thugged-out, gun-toting, cocaine-slanging street menace that so often shows up in his lyrics. Instead, he was a college-educated corrections officer before he turned to the music industry to make his millions.

Carson’s exaggerations don’t go that far—his tales are far more pedestrian. But in story after story the iconic physician appears to embellish his life growing up in inner city Detroit. He certainly did not need to spin wild tales about his years as a young, gifted black boy raised by a single mother in urban America. That’s a story millions know and can relate to.

However, in various books, speeches and interviews, Carson appears to want something of a “hood pass”—an acknowledgement of his toughness authenticity—that functions both as insulation from “liberal media attacks” and as political currency among white Republican voters. The lure of a Carson candidacy (as I said in an earlier column) could not be more appealing to the evangelical base, which has been looking for a way to attract more non-white voters. For them, Carson is the perfect ambassador: an American success story who also happens to be black, and the quintessential Horatio Alger from the rough side of the railroad tracks.

For his part, Carson is playing along and seemingly has been for decades. He has leaned on (and sometimes added flourishes to) his backstory in order to expand his public platform. The truth is he has been building a personal narrative—whether true or weaved from whole cloth—about himself from the moment he leapt onto the world stage. He wasn’t just poor, in Carson’s telling, he was hard—the kind of hard that can get an otherwise promising young man into trouble. And while it might be customary in hip-hop, engaging in this kind of self “thugification” is new for politics.

Without a doubt, Carson grew up surrounded by pervasive poverty, and avoiding a myriad of societal maladies in the Motor City was no small feat. For every Ben Carson, there are thousands of black boys who didn’t make it to the sunrise—the ones whose mothers watched tearfully as they left the block cuffed in the back of a squad car or wept over their bodies in a funeral home. Carson more than beat the odds. The bookish kid with thick glasses and a pocket protector earned his way into Yale and went on to become one of the world’s most celebrated surgeons.
Today, based almost solely on that story, Carson is currently leading national polls for the Republican presidential nomination. However, in recent days, key elements—as told by Carson himself— have come under increased scrutiny.

To hear the good doctor tell it, he once tried to stab a “close relative” in a dispute over a radio and at another point he wanted to hit his mother in the head with a brick. He allegedly hurled a rock at a school friend, busting his glasses and leaving him with a bloody nose. If fact, if Carson can be believed, he was so violent that he needed a divine intervention.

It’s a compelling story—one that has sold millions of books, led to a biopic about his life, and earned him countless awards over the years. The problem is almost none of its flourishes ring true and, despite the earnest efforts of reporters, almost none of them can be verified. As it turns out, CNN could find no one—not even the next-door neighbor kids—who could remember a young, hot-tempered Carson, let alone one who tried to murder somebody.
There is such a thing as revealing too much and in that regard Ben Carson can be his own worse enemy.

RELATED: Carson Blows Up at Reporters During Presser: Why Don’t You Care About Obama’s Past?

Saturday, November 7, 2015

Liberal Latino Advocacy Group Gets Kids To Hurl Curses At Donald Trump


TheHill.com:
GOP presidential candidate Donald Trump panned an ad Friday that features children uttering profanities at him.

“I think it’s terrible,” he said of the video produced by the Deport Racism PAC. "It’s totally backfired.

“To have young kids using that kind of language is a disgrace,” Trump said on Fox Business Network’s “Mornings with Maria.”

“Anybody who would do an ad like that is stupid, to be honest,” the outspoken billionaire added. "They’re stupid people who would do an ad like that.”

Trump insisted that the controversial spot is helping, not hurting, his 2016 White House run.

“People are actually going wild about it and saying, ‘We’re going to support Trump now,’” he told host Maria Bartiromo.

“I’m doing great with Hispanics and I am going to win Hispanics because they know I’m going to bring back jobs from lots of places, including India and China,” Trump added.

The Deport Racism ad, released Wednesday, features children cursing Trump’s deportation policies.
It depicts two Hispanic children — “Ricardo” and “Rosa” — uttering foul language as a means of satirizing the Republican’s rhetoric on illegal immigration.

“F**k you, [you] racist f**k,” Ricardo tells Trump. "If you don’t like the Constitution and what it stands for, then get the f**k out of my country.”

The video’s release comes as Trump takes fire from some in the Hispanic community the day before hosting NBC’s “Saturday Night Live."

Multiple Latino advocacy groups, celebrities and lawmakers have urged the network to revoke the real estate tycoon’s invitation.

The Congressional Hispanic Caucus, for example, said Monday that NBC should pull the plug on Trump’s scheduled appearance.

Deport Racism is additionally offering $5,000 to anyone who calls Trump “racist” during the live broadcast on Saturday night.
I haven't watched an episode of SNL all year, but I'm definitely watching tonight.


RELATED: Why huge 'SNL' ratings won't help Donald Trump become president

Ben Carson Schools CNN's Alisyn Camerota On How The Liberal Media Manipulate's Audiences



RELATED: Ben Carson Defends Pyramid Comments: ‘Secular Progressives Try To Ridicule’ My Faith

Friday, November 6, 2015

Amid Falling Poll Numbers, Chris Christie at Risk of Missing Next Debate


Mediaite.com:
New Jersey Governor and presidential candidate Chris Christie is at risk of missing the next Republican debate after his polling numbers fell below a certain percentage.

In order to make next week’s Fox Business Network debate, candidates must poll an average of 2.5% in the four most recent national polls. In the four most recent polls, Christie has polled at 2%, 3%, 3% and 1%, making his current average 2.25%. The polling deadline ended Wednesday at midnight.

Likewise, Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal and former New York Governor George Pataki have failed to poll at 1% in any of those polls, a requirement for the 6 PM undercard debate. However, CNN’s Dylan Byers points out that if Fox Business decides to use the lesser-known International Business Times poll, Jindal would be allowed to participate.

The full line-up of both debates will announced at 7 PM on FBN’s The Lou Dobbs Show.
Good. Whether he's making a fool of himself attempting to politicize local law enforcement, flat-out lying about the BlackLivesMatter movement, dismissing that God-awful CNBC debate or 'that Obama hug', Chris Christie just needs to give it up already, Even the people of New Jersey don't support his run for President. Christie was my man to beat Barry in 2012, but he chose to stay out the race. Now 4 years later, the luster is gone.

RELATED: Chris Christie's Drug Addiction Video Wins Praise From Many Corners

Thursday, November 5, 2015

Bernie Sanders Now Says There Are ‘Valid Questions’ About Hillary’s Damn Emails


Mediaite.com:
Remember that big moment at the Democratic debate when Bernie Sanders said the American people are sick and tired of hearing about Hillary Clinton‘s damn emails? Well, it turns out Sanders didn’t mean that to suggest he doesn’t think there’s anything worth investigating.

Sanders gave an interview to The Wall Street Journal today in which he was asked whether he was dismissing the Clinton email controversy altogether.

He said no and admitted that there are “valid questions” about concerns that there was classified material on Clinton’s server. And yes, Sanders thinks the federal investigation is appropriate.

And he wasn’t done there:
On the issue of Mrs. Clinton’s emails, Mr. Sanders didn’t say he regretted his debate remarks. “You get 12 seconds to say these things,” he said of the debate setting. “There’s an investigation going on right now. I did not say, ‘End the investigation.’ That’s silly… Let the investigation proceed unimpeded.”
When Sanders was asked about Clinton’s trustworthiness and emails back in August, he deferred and refused to attack her.

Houston, Texas Rejects Lesbian Mayor's Attempt To Allow Men To Use Women's Bathrooms


NYTimes.com:
The predominantly black Third Ward here, a historic and struggling community, seemed like the kind of precinct that would be sympathetic to a broad ordinance outlawing discrimination based on factors such as race, religion and sexual orientation.

But at a polling site in the Cuney Homes public housing complex here on Tuesday, the talk among voters was not about discrimination. Picking up on an ad campaign run by a coalition of pastors, social conservatives and Republicans opposed to the measure, they voiced concerns as parents that it would let men claiming to be women enter women’s bathrooms and attack.

“I got three daughters,” said Todd Ward, a city worker who voted against the ordinance. “You have too much child molestation going on. It’s equal rights, but there’s not an equal right for me to go into a women’s bathroom. That’s common sense.”

More than a year ago, when Mayor Annise D. Parker and her supporters first proposed the ordinance and steered it through the City Council, they expected it to be welcomed in a diverse city that had become, with Ms. Parker’s election in 2009, the nation’s first big city to elect an openly gay or lesbian mayor.

Instead, voters called for the ordinance’s repeal on Tuesday, a blow to gay and transgender rights advocates, and perhaps the most significant victory for social conservatives since they were rocked by the Supreme Court ruling in June establishing a constitutional right to same-sex marriage. Voters rejected the ordinance overwhelmingly, 61 percent to 39 percent.
Good for Houston. As a side note on this perverse and ridiculous issue: Funny how you never have women who identify as men wanting to use men's bathrooms.

RELATED:  What Last Night’s Election Results Prove About Social Conservatism and Voters

Wednesday, November 4, 2015

GOP Overplays Hand (Again) in Debate-Complaint Department


Mediaite.com:
It's amusing to listen to the president and DNC chair offer advice on being tough in debate settings, as Mr. Obama never had to participate in a debate with Fox moderators (who proved to be tough to Republicans despite predictions of softballs going back to August), nor has DWS ever allowed one on that network as DNC chair. And you know what they say, if you can’t handle those guys (and girls), I don’t think the Chinese and Russians are going to be too worried about you (no worries, they’re already not).

Back to the Republicans, any coalition they tried to hastily put together has already fallen apart, with Christie, Fiorina and Kasich wisely dismissing the GOP letter proposing debate changes. If you’re negotiating this moving forward, the solution is fairly simple: instead of allowing pundits/opinion folks, pick and choose print reporters to be moderators instead. Remember, these debates have drawn record numbers for Fox, CNN twice, and CNBC. Moderating such an event only raises anyone’s brand (and, for example, if done correctly like Anderson Cooper did with CNN’s Democratic debate, gravitas). But if a political print reporter is in that moderator spot, the look-at-me element goes away, and in the process, substantive questions without editorial grandstanding come in its place.

So for the debate slot open on February 26th with the RNC (for now) booting NBC, Jim Oliphant of Reuters and Julie Pace of the Associated Press would be two down-the-middle, solid, veteran political reporters to strongly consider to handle that debate if placed elsewhere. Sorry… Glenn Beck or Rush Limbaugh ain’t the answer here.

In the meantime, the GOP needs to cease complaining about the CNBC debate. It’s already old news. Fix the problem (quietly and without multiple campaigns negotiating, which redefines the definition of herding cats) and move on. Calling out media bias will get some applause at rallies, yes. Right-wing radio will cheer, yes. But in the end, the voters that really count in the general aren’t going to care very much.

Given the scrutiny the CNBC debate received, it’s a safe bet to assume future moderators will be careful to avoid editorializing in their questions given the microscope that’s on them now. And hopefully, finally, we’ll get some real answers when real questions are asked, which would make everyone–the candidates, voters–happy if entertainment isn’t solely the goal.

Give us an inch, we’ll take a mile. Republicans sure know how to turn a positive into a negative quickly. But given there’s still 370 days to Election Day, there’s still plenty of time to cut through the noise and controversy to get… you know… an actual, detailed message out.

RELATED: Megyn Kelly: Let’s face it, those debate demands from Republican candidates were absurd

$20 Trillion Man: National Debt Nearly Doubles During Barack Obama Presidency


WashingtonTimes.com:
When President Obama signs into law the new two-year budget deal Monday, his action will bring into sharper focus a part of his legacy that he doesn’t like to talk about: He is the $20 trillion man.

Mr. Obama’s spending agreement with Congress will suspend the nation’s debt limit and allow the Treasury to borrow another $1.5 trillion or so by the end of his presidency in 2017. Added to the current total national debt of more than $18.15 trillion, the red ink will likely be crowding the $20 trillion mark right around the time Mr. Obama leaves the White House.

When Mr. Obama took over in January 2009, the total national debt stood at $10.6 trillion. That means the debt will have very nearly doubled during his eight years in office, and there is much more debt ahead with the abandonment of “sequestration” spending caps enacted in 2011.

“Congress and the president have just agreed to undo one of the only successful fiscal restraint mechanisms in a generation,” said Pete Sepp, president of the National Taxpayers Union. “The progress on reducing spending and the deficit has just become much more problematic."
RELATED: The 7 Keys To Trapping As Many Americans As Possible In Poverty

Tuesday, November 3, 2015

Barack Obama Admin.: Transgender Student Born Male Must Be Allowed to Shower With Girls



Mediaite.com:
In a new ruling from the Department of Education, a Chicago-area school district must allow a transgender student who was born male to shower with other members of the girls’ soccer team.

Township High School District 211 had set up a compromise where they had set up “privacy curtains” in the girl’s locker room and required the then eighth-grade student to use the cordoned area. But after a two-year investigation, the DoE found that the arrangement represented discrimination on the basis of sex.

“All students deserve the opportunity to participate equally in school programs and activities — this is a basic civil right,” Assistant U.S. Secretary Catherine Lhamon said in a statement.

“This decision makes me extremely happy — because of what it means for me, personally, and for countless others,” the student told CNN. “The district’s policy stigmatized me, often making me feel like I was not a ‘normal person.'”
You'd think sick stories like this would unite conservatives as it's just another example of liberals refusal to compromise on anything. Bottom line, as long as Democrats (aka liberals) are in charge we will continue to live in a fascist country where feelings will matter more than facts. And we will dwell farther and farther away from God's word as well.

RELATED: Feminization of America Is Bad for the World

Sunday, November 1, 2015

White House Will Block Release of Hillary Clinton Emails to....Barack Obama


HotAir.com:
Rank has its privileges, after all, and the highest rank can claim executive privilege. The White House will informally use its privilege to keep e-mails between Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton on her secret e-mail system shielded from public scrutiny, the New York Times’ Michael Shear reports.
This makes for an interesting Friday night document dump, no?
The White House will try to block the release of a handful of emails between President Obama and former Secretary of StateHillary Rodham Clinton, citing longstanding precedent invoked by presidents of both parties to keep presidential communications confidential, officials said Friday.
The State Department discovered the emails between Mr. Obama and Mrs. Clinton as part of its effort to release the former secretary’s emails, several thousand more of which were scheduled to be made public on Friday. Mr. Obama’s correspondence was forwarded for review to the White House, which has decided against release.
That decision could intensify the political struggle between Mrs. Clinton, who is running for president, and congressional Republicans, who have pressed for disclosure of her emails as part of an investigation into the administration’s handling of the attacks on an American compound in Benghazi, Libya, in 2012.
This sounds a little more juicy than it is, which we’ll get to in a moment. The bigger news is that another 268 e-mails from Hillary’s secret server have been classified, including at least one that she initiated:
Hundreds more emails from Hillary Clinton’s time as secretary of state were newly deemed classified as part of Friday’s State Department release of more than 7,000 pages of her messages, which revealed more about Clinton’s knowledge of embassy security issues and lighter moments like Clinton’s use of emojis.
Friday’s document release is the sixth of its kind and with it, more than half of the messages turned over to the agency have now been made publicly available. The 268 emails now deemed classified in this batch are at the lowest classification tier, according to State Department spokesman John Kirby, who said that none of these emails “were marked classified at the time they were sent or received.” There are now between 600 and 700 emails newly marked as classified since the releases began in May.
Back to the privilege claim. Unlike the other claim of executive privilege made in the Operation Fast and Furious probe by Congress involving Eric Holder, privilege in this circumstance does have long precedent. This directly involves communication between a President and his advisers (which includes Cabinet Secretaries), the case for which executive privilege explicitly exists. In order to overcome that claim, Congress or a court would have to have cause to suspect that specific violations of the law exist. One cannot conduct fishing expeditions without something specific in mind, unless a President chose to release the communications and waive the privilege. The classic case of piercing the privilege was with Richard Nixon’s tapes in the Watergate scandal, when there was already plenty of reason to suspect that the tapes had information relating to potentially criminal behavior. Nothing like that exists here, at least not yet.

Of course, invoking that privilege carries some political risks regardless of whether the circumstance falls completely within the classic model or not. In this case, Congress is looking into the deaths of four Americans in a terrorist attack on a consulate for which it provided inadequate security. If any of these e-mails relate to the attack or to the security of the Benghazi compound, then withholding them becomes at least politically problematic. The odds of that are probably pretty low, but the fact that they’re locking the e-mails down makes it impossible to rule out, too.

The mystery doesn’t do many favors for either Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama. It just serves to remind everyone that the White House knew full well that Hillary was using a private e-mail system and never bothered to mention it while Congress and several courts were being told that State had no e-mail records responsive to numerous and legitimate requests related to both oversight and transparency. Keeping those e-mails secret in the middle of an investigation into Benghazi only ties Obama more closely to both the Benghazi probe and Hillary’s e-mail scandal.
RELATED: We cannot allow Hillary Clinton, 'midwife to chaos' and a public liar, to be our next president