Virginia Gunman Bryce Williams Was A Closet Homosexual

Breitbart.com:

On Wednesday, America met a deeply evil human being: Vester Lee Flanagan II, also known as reporter Bryce Williams.

Williams murdered two people while they were live on air on WDBJ in Virginia: reporter Alison Parker, and cameraman Adam Ward. After the murders, he went on the run – and while he was on the run, he tweeted out his rationale for the killings, accusing Parker of making “racist comments” and Ward of going “to hr on me after working with me one time!!!” He then posted video to his Facebook and Twitter pages of himself shooting both at point-blank range.

Williams is black. Parker and Ward were white.

Williams is gay. Parker and Ward were straight.

None of which would be relevant, except that Williams specifically cited his identity as a factor in the killings. In a 23-page rambling letter sent to ABC News, Williams wrote that the Charleston church shooting in June should have provoked a race war: “Why did I do it? I put a deposit for a gun on 6/19/15. The Church shooting in Charleston happened on 6/17/15…What sent me over the top was the church shooting…You want a race war (deleted)? BRING IT THEN YOU WHITE …(deleted)!!!” According to ABC News, he claimed he had “suffered racial discrimination, sexual harassment and bullying at work,” that he had “been attacked by black men and white females,” and that he had been “attacked for being a gay, black man.”

Williams marinated in his self-appointed victimhood status. He filed a lawsuit against his Tallahassee, Florida employer, WTWC – a lawsuit settled out of court. He filed a complaint with the with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission against WDBJ after his firing – a complaint the EEOC dismissed. According to WDBJ station manager Jeff Marks, Williams was “an unhappy man” with a “reputation as someone who had been difficult to work with… looking out for people to say things that he could take offense to.”

Social liberal work policies that make it harder to do background checks on potential employees kept landing this pervert, psycho and madman jobs, but the lib media won't focus on that because he was gay and black.

RELATED: How Bryce Williams Kept Landing New Jobs

Ben Carson Catches Up to Tie Donald Trump in New Iowa Poll

Mediaite.com:

In the weeks since the first GOP debate on Fox News, Ben Carson has been slowing moving into the #2 position in several polls, but has always trailed frontrunner Donald Trump by significant margins — until now. In the latest Monmouth University poll of likely Iowa Republican caucusgoers, Carson is tied with Trump at 23%. 

Those numbers represent a 10 point jump for Trump since July and a 15 point increase for Carson. The last time Monmouth University surveyed Iowans, Scott Walker held a commanding lead with 22%. 

The survey puts Trump and Carson far out ahead of the rest of the GOP pack, with the other so-called “outsider” candidate Carly Fiorina coming in second place with 10%. Ted Cruz is third with 9%, Scott Walker is fourth with 7% and Jeb Bush is all the way down at fifth place with just 5% of the vote. 

And while Trump and Carson are tied overall in the poll, which was conducted from August 27-30 and with a statewide sample of 405 Iowa Republicans and margin of error of +/- 4.9 percentage points, Carson actually leads Trump among Evangelicals (29-23%) and women (30-19%). Trump leads Carson among tea party voters (27-22%) and men (27-17%). 

Carson also has by far the best favorability rating of any GOP candidate in Iowa with 81% favorable and just 6% unfavorable. Despite his success, Trump has a favorability rating of 52% with 33% of those surveyed viewing him unfavorably.

RELATED: Ben Carson Rising: Is Nice Making a Comeback?

‘Hillary 2016’ Has Never Made Sense for Democrats

TheAtlantic.com:

As Hillary Clinton loses ground to Bernie Sanders in Iowa, where her lead shrinks by the day, it’s worth noticing that she has never made particular sense as the Democratic Party’s nominee. She may be more electable than her social-democratic rival from Vermont, but plenty of Democrats are better positioned to represent the center-left coalition. Why have they let the former secretary of state keep them out of the race? If Clinton makes it to the general election, I understand why most Democrats will support her. She shares their views on issues as varied as preserving Obamacare, abortion rights, extending legal status to undocumented workers, strengthening labor unions, and imposing a carbon tax to slow climate change.

But most Democrats hold similar positions on those issues. So why are Democrats supporting her in a primary bid? She’s awful on other issues they’ve deemed hugely important.

Most Democrats regard the Iraq War as a historic disaster. Clinton voted for that conflict. That hawkishness wasn’t a fluke. She pushed for U.S. intervention in Libya without Congressional approval and without anticipating all that has gone wrong in that country. She favored U.S. intervention in the Syrian civil war as well. Why haven’t Democrats concluded that she has dangerously bad judgment on foreign policy? She certainly hasn’t done anything to distinguish herself in that realm.

Along with the Iraq War, Democrats disdained George W. Bush for the Patriot Act, his expansive views on executive power, and his awful record on transparency. Clinton voted for the Patriot Act. She shows every sign of embracing a similarly expansive view of executive power. And she took extraordinary steps to shield her emails from federal public-records and freedom of information laws.

Then there are her financial backers.

Many Democrats are sympathetic to Occupy Wall Street and to the notion that wealthy special interests on Wall Street are rigging the system by buying off politicians. Who is more bought off than Clinton? It isn’t just her campaign coffers and her family’s foundation that benefit from Wall Street money. Her family’s private accounts are flush with funds from big banks, including at least one that benefitted from her tenure at State and paid her husband seven figures for a speaking gig. It is naive to think that she won’t look out for the interests of Big Finance in Washington.

RELATED: Clinton Asked Diplomat to Send Classified Intel to ‘My Personal Email’

Kate Steinle's Family to Sue ICE After Murder: 'The System Failed My Sister'

Townhall.com:

Kate Steinle's family is seeking justice in their daughter's premature death at the hands of an illegal immigrant. Francisco Sanchez, an illegal immigrant who'd been arrested and deported multiple times, should never have been allowed to walk on the Embarcadero. Yet, our porous border and weak customs enforcement allowed Sanchez to reenter the United States and go on a shooting spree the same night Steinle happened to be walking along a San Francisco pier with her dad. She died in her dad's arms.

Now, her parents are suing the city's sheriff, Ross Mirkarimi, along with Immigration and Customs Enforcement and The Bureau of Land Management for not doing more to prevent a criminal like Sanchez from coming back across the border. Her mom, Liz Sullivan, said the tragedy demands action:

"Everyone can’t keep saying this is the way it is — it isn’t the way it has to be. We have to stand up and say we’re mad as hell we’re not going to take it anymore,” Sullivan said.

In their lawsuit, the Steinle family is likely to specifically target sanctuary city policies like the one in place in San Francisco. These policies prohibit city employees from partnering with federal authorities to investigate or punish illegal immigrants. In jail, Sanchez admitted San Francisco's sanctuary city status enticed him to locate there. Sheriff Mirkarimi reportedly had Sanchez in custody, and released him without alerting ICE.

Several government agencies' lack of oversight led to Steinle's death, her family insisted at a press conference in front of San Francisco City Hall on Tuesday. 

RELATED:  The Number of Victims Shows There’s No Excuse for Sanctuary Cities

150 Missouri High School Students Walk Out in Protest of Cross-Dressing Boy Using Girls’ Locker Room

NYTimes.com:

A transgender high school student in Missouri is facing backlash from her peers after requesting to use the girls’ bathrooms and locker room.

More than 100 students at Hillsboro High School, about an hour south of St Louis, walked out of class on Monday in protest.

“I’m hoping this dies down,” said Lila Perry, the 17-year-old who began identifying as a girl publicly in February. “I don’t want my entire senior year to be like this.”

Ms. Perry, who began feeling “more like a girl than a boy” when she was 13, said school officials gave her permission to use the girls’ facilities as the new school year began.

The district’s superintendent, Aaron D. Cornman, issued a statement saying the district “accepts all students no matter race, nationality/ethnicity, gender or sexual orientation.”

The student protest came on the heels of a school board meeting on Thursday attended by so many parents it had to be moved to a bigger location.

“My goal is for the district and parents to have a policy discussion,” said Derrick Good, a lawyer who has two daughters in the district and wants students to use either facilities based on their biological sex or other gender-neutral facilities.

He worked with the Alliance Defending Freedom, a Christian advocacy group, to draft a “student physical privacy policy” and submit it to the district, which has about 3,500 students.

Ms. Perry previously used a unisex faculty bathroom, the St. Louis Post-Dispatch reported.

Mr. Good said he got involved after hearing about a female student who encountered “an intact male” in the girls’ locker room.

“It’s a violation of my daughters’ rights to privacy to not have a policy,” he said.

Of course, the easy solution for this pervert would be to give him his own bathroom, but in Obama's morally bankrupt America feelings count more than facts regardless of who gets hurt in the process.

RELATED: I Am Cait: Why Caitlyn Jenner's Low Ratings Aren't All Bad News

Left-Wing Activist/Faux Journalist Jorge Ramos’s Daughter Works for Hillary Clinton's Campaign

TheAmericanMirror.com:

Jorge Ramos, the amnesty activist moonlighting as a Univision and Fusion journalist, revealed in June that his daughter is an employee of the Hillary Clinton campaign.

In a statement on the Fusion website, Ramos wrote:

As journalists the most important thing we have is our credibility and integrity. We maintain that, in part, through transparency with our audience, our colleagues and our critics. That is why I am disclosing that my daughter, Paola, has accepted a position working with Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign.

As a father, I am very proud that she has decided to actively participate in our democratic process. I hope that more young people get involved, regardless of political parties or ideological preferences. Our democracy and our future depend on that.

I completely support and respect Paola’s decision. In our family we have always cherished tolerance, dialogue and active participation in what you believe.

Like many reporters who have parents, siblings or other family members that are active in politics, this will not change how I approach my duty as a journalist. I will continue to report with complete independence and ask the tough questions, the same way I have done for the last 30 years.
Ramos was temporarily removed from a press conference being held by Republican presidential front runner Donald Trump in Iowa yesterday.

As Trump called on a reporter, Ramos stood and began shouting questions. Trump asked him to sit down, but instead Ramos continued to interrupt the proceedings. After Ramos was briefly removed from the room, he returned, only to debate Trump for several minutes, instead of asking questions and waiting for answers.

As Real Clear Politics reports, “The two went head to head for five minutes over birthright citizenship, how Trump would build a wall, how he would deport illegal immigrants and more. Trump fought back against Ramos and attempted to get him to acknowledge crime committed by illegal immigrants.”

The revelation certainly casts Ramos’s stunt against Hillary’s chief Republican rival in a new light.

RELATED: Social media erupts as ‘left-wing racist’ Jorge Ramos calls Kate’s Law ‘unfair’ to illegals

Chris Christie Quote of the Day!

“Well, they’re not, but what my point was that this is once again a situation where the private sector laps us in the government with the use of technology. Let’s use the same technology to make sure that 40% of the 11 million who are here illegally don’t overstay their visas.” 

- NJ Governor and 2016 Presidential candidate Chris Christie on his plan to deal with illegal immigration if elected President

Ain't The Devil Happy: In The News 8/30/15

Trump: I'm Winning Because Americans Are "Tired of Being the Pasties"

Poll: 71% Think Political Correctness is a Problem in America

A Sheriff Blames His deputy's Death on the Black Lives Matter Movement

Obama Does Nothing To Stop ISIS

Planned Parenthood Sues Alabama: State Has No Choice But to Fund Us

Christian Film 'War Room' Stuns Hollywood With $11 Million Weekend

In 2008, Fewer Than 30 Million Used Food Stamps. Now 46 Million Do

NY Times Headlines Make Clarence Thomas Look Like a Plagiarist

'Official Misconduct Charge' Referred Against Marriage Clerk

Hillary Clinton Strikes A New Tone On E-mail Scandal

LATimes.com:

Hillary Rodham Clinton's team has long scoffed at polling that shows voter concern about her trustworthiness and honesty. Clinton herself has even dismissed it as voters' confusion amid all the attacks directed at her by enemies on the right. 

The campaign suggests such numbers are overshadowed by the candidate's deep support among Democratic voters nationwide, reflected in her commanding lead in the race for the party's nomination. 

But it has become clear in recent days that the numbers do matter, particularly as Clinton finds herself unable to contain growing public unease with her emailing practices while secretary of State. Key Democrats are anxious over the way the campaign has handled the scandal, and they are eager to see Clinton confront the impression among a large swath of voters that she lacks honesty. 

In recent weeks, the campaign's shifting approach to the problem has been clear. After a news conference in Nevada, where a visibly agitated Clinton responded with sarcasm and annoyance to questions about her use of a private server for government business, the candidate's tone changed. By the time she arrived in Iowa for a campaign event Wednesday, she was contrite. "I know people have raised questions about my email use as secretary of State, and I understand why," she said. "I get it." 

In Minneapolis on Friday, she again used a careful tone. "I'm trying to do a better job of explaining to people what is going on," she said at a news conference. 

It is not just supporters of Vice President Joe Biden who are keeping a close watch on how Clinton is handling the matter. Donors and other influential Democrats are looking for assurance that Clinton will be able to move past the controversy. It won't be easy. The issue is not going away anytime soon. 

The email practices are at the center of multiple government investigations -- including one by the FBI -- and the State Department is under a court order to publicly release each month thousands of previously undisclosed emails sent and received by Clinton while she was at the State Department, with the latest batch due Monday. 

Hillary's changing her tone because of Bernie Sanders more than anything else IMO.

RELATED:  Hillary Supporter Ed Rendell: She’s Handled Email Issue ‘Atrociously,’ Very ‘Tone-Deaf’

Buying Sex Should Not Be Legal

NYTimes.com:

HERE in my city, earlier this month, Amnesty International’s international council endorsed a new policy calling for the decriminalization of the global sex trade. Its proponents argue that decriminalizing prostitution is the best way of protecting “the human rights of sex workers,” though the policy would apply equally to pimps, brothel-keepers and johns.

Amnesty’s stated aim is to remove the stigma from prostituted women, so that they will be less vulnerable to abuse by criminals operating in the shadows. The group is also calling on governments “to ensure that sex workers enjoy full and equal legal protection from exploitation, trafficking and violence.”

The Amnesty vote comes in the context of a prolonged international debate about how to deal with prostitution and protect the interests of so-called sex workers. It is a debate in which I have a personal stake — and I believe Amnesty is making a historic mistake.

I entered the sex trade — as most do — before I was even a woman. At age 14, I was placed in the care of the state after my father committed suicide and because my mother suffered from mental illness.

Within a year, I was on the streets with no home, education or job skills. All I had was my body. At 15, I met a young man who thought it would be a good idea for me to prostitute myself. As “fresh meat,” I was a commodity in high demand.

For seven years, I was bought and sold. On the streets, that could be 10 times in a night. It’s hard to describe the full effect of the psychological coercion, and how deeply it eroded my confidence. By my late teens, I was using cocaine to dull the pain.

I cringe when I hear the words “sex work.” Selling my body wasn’t a livelihood. There was no resemblance to ordinary employment in the ritual degradation of strangers’ using my body to satiate their urges. I was doubly exploited — by those who pimped me and those who bought me.

I know there are some advocates who argue that women in prostitution sell sex as consenting adults. But those who do are a relatively privileged minority — primarily white, middle-class, Western women in escort agencies — not remotely representative of the global majority. Their right to sell doesn’t trump my right and others’ not to be sold in a trade that preys on women already marginalized by class and race.

RELATED: Prostitution far from a victimless crime